sierraintegrative.comSierra Integrative Medical Center
sierraintegrative.com Profile
sierraintegrative.com
Sub Domains:staging.sierraintegrative.com
Title:Sierra Integrative Medical Center
Description:We take proven conventional medical treatments combined with alternative therapies to give you the most impactful approach to treating your illness. We utilize a combination of traditional medical treatments, alternative medicine, natural and biological medicines, homeopathy, and neurotherapy to create unique treatment programs. Our programs are entirely built around every aspect of the patient, not just what needs to be treated.
Discover sierraintegrative.com website stats, rating, details and status online.Use our online tools to find owner and admin contact info. Find out where is server located.Read and write reviews or vote to improve it ranking. Check alliedvsaxis duplicates with related css, domain relations, most used words, social networks references. Go to regular site
sierraintegrative.com Information
Website / Domain: |
sierraintegrative.com |
HomePage size: | 33.72 KB |
Page Load Time: | 0.291919 Seconds |
Website IP Address: |
45.56.69.182 |
Isp Server: |
Linode |
sierraintegrative.com Ip Information
Ip Country: |
United States |
City Name: |
Dallas |
Latitude: |
32.783058166504 |
Longitude: |
-96.806671142578 |
sierraintegrative.com Keywords accounting
sierraintegrative.com Httpheader
Server: openresty |
Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 23:17:54 GMT |
Content-Type: text/html |
Content-Length: 11878 |
Connection: keep-alive |
Content-Encoding: gzip |
Via: 1.1 varnish, 1.1 varnish |
Age: 2471 |
X-Served-By: cache-dca17727-DCA, cache-sea4426-SEA |
X-Cache: MISS, HIT |
X-Cache-Hits: 0, 1 |
X-Timer: S1589671075.657862,VS0,VE1 |
Vary: Accept-Encoding |
X-Cache-Status: MISS |
X-Cluster-Name: us-west-2-prod-eks-15 |
Accept-Ranges: bytes |
sierraintegrative.com Meta Info
charset="utf-8"/ |
content="We take proven conventional medical treatments combined with alternative therapies to give you the most impactful approach to treating your illness. We utilize a combination of traditional medical treatments, alternative medicine, natural and biological medicines, homeopathy, and neurotherapy to create unique treatment programs. Our programs are entirely built around every aspect of the patient, not just what needs to be treated." name="description"/ |
content="Sierra Integrative Medical Center" property="og:title"/ |
content="We take proven conventional medical treatments combined with alternative therapies to give you the most impactful approach to treating your illness. We utilize a combination of traditional medical treatments, alternative medicine, natural and biological medicines, homeopathy, and neurotherapy to create unique treatment programs. Our programs are entirely built around every aspect of the patient, not just what needs to be treated." property="og:description"/ |
content="summary" name="twitter:card"/ |
content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1" name="viewport"/ |
content="Webflow" name="generator"/ |
45.56.69.182 Domains
sierraintegrative.com Similar Website
Domain |
WebSite Title |
staging.sierraintegrative.com | Sierra Integrative Medical Center |
sierraintegrative.com | Sierra Integrative Medical Center |
arizonaadvancedmedicine.com | Scottsdale Integrative Medical Center | Arizona Medicine |
sierra-view.com | Sierra View Medical Center | Porterville Hospital |
sierramed.candidatecare.jobs | Careers - Sierra Medical Services Alliance |
ccib.camden.rutgers.edu | Center for Computational and Integrative Biology |
w.marinocenter.org | The Marino Center for Integrative Health - Cambridge |
integrativemedicine.arizona.edu | : Andrew Weil Center for Integrative Medicine |
nihadc.com | Holistic Integrative Medicine and Dental Center | Washington DC, MD, VA |
tuftsmedicalcenter.org | Tufts Medical Center | Boston Hospital and Academic Medical Center |
marinocenter.org | The Marino Center for Integrative Health - Cambridge - Mount Auburn Hospital |
mercycare.org | Mercy Medical Center: Eastern Iowa's Best Hospital & Clinics - Mercy Medical Center |
cim.umaryland.edu | Center for Integrative Medicine | University of Maryland School of Medicine |
cim.med.miami.edu | Osher Center for Integrative Medicine at Miller School of Medicine |
connect.rwmc.net | Regional West Medical Center Multispecialty Medical Group |
sierraintegrative.com Traffic Sources Chart
sierraintegrative.com Alexa Rank History Chart
sierraintegrative.com Html To Plain Text
Give Us a Call: 775.828.5388 We've Found What You're Looking For Integrative Medicine For Your Health & Wellness. Learn More A Bad Decision in Desperate Times My Fellow Osteopathic Physicians: By now many of you have heard about an emergency regulation signed by Governor Sisolak on Monday March 23rd that essentially bans the use of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine from being prescribed for use against the COVID-19 pandemic sweeping throughout the world today. When reading the accompanying justification for an emergency regulation, one gets the impression that it was done due to doubts about the medicationsâ safety and efficacy in regard to COVID-19, along with a concern regarding a shortage of these meds for other chronic conditions. However, when I called the Board of Pharmacy (BOP) I was given a different story that squarely blamed doctors for trying to self-prescribe and deplete the supply of medications. Thus, the BOP proposed this emergency regulation on Sunday night (March 22) and had a public hearing the next day, at which time the Governor signed the proposed regulations. Please see the link for full text: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1905SK7ox7YDaP1d-W6BjCNgJVTiIX0U/view . For the record, the frantic pace at which this regulation was pushed through clearly excluded any input from practicing physicians or the organizations and groups that represent their patients, interests and opinions. I have confirmed thru phone calls that neither NOMA nor the Nevada State Medical Association were given any notice of this proposed regulation. In essence, as explained to me by the BOP, this change to the Nevada Administrative Code would prohibit the writing or dispensing of the aforementioned medications for a diagnosis of COVID-19 in an outpatient setting but allow for it to be used only in an inpatient setting. Also, as per the BOP, the hospital could then prescribe or dispense the medication for that same patient as an outpatient to continue care. Otherwise, new prescriptions for use of these compounds in the rheumatologic role could continue, but an ICD-10 code would be required and supply limited to 30-days. Like any other physician trying to practice in these trying times, I fully understand and have severe issue with anyone hoarding needed medications or protective equipment that could help someone in need. From this perspective, I understand the BOPâs position on this matter and their utterly staunch opposition to any compromise on this matter until further evidence is forthcoming for outpatient setting use of the hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine. However, I am absolutely convinced that this rash decision by the BOP and Governor is an undeniable mistake that will prevent physicians from being able to administer a potentially curative therapy that could prevent both morbidity and mortality. My dear colleagues, this is a scope of practice issue and clearly interferes with a physicianâs decision on how to treat their patients. I wholeheartedly am in opposition to this regulation for many reasons: â First, it is my most deep and heartfelt opinion that a treatment choice should ultimately be a decision left to physicians and their patient. When you are regularly seeing a patient, you know them better and understand their nuances more than a hospitalist or other triage person seeing this patient for the first time. Second, this deeper knowledge of said patient will result in a better capability to realize that a patientâs condition is worsening and when they really need to be hospitalized or have a specific intervention. This is especially the case with COVID-19, where a hospital triage screener is looking only at specific parameters to determine need for more acute care. Currently the recommendation outside of obvious symptoms such as dyspnea and chest pain, is that a patient who is suspected of having this illness is advised to return home to self-isolate and observe but if they worsen then return to hospital to be admitted. Clincally, since 80% of patients have limited illnesses, you are sending them home to run this course. However, with the remaining 20%, you are waiting for them to show signs of significant worsening before actually admitting to the hospital. The patientâs primary care physician is a much better judge of this deteriorating situation than a stranger who has not had as much interaction with patient. In fact, often hospital triage and ER personnel are trying to deter admissions to reduce the potential of spread of the virus and such a delay could be critical to the outcome of a patient. Third, in my humble opinion, since it is at this stage of initial worsening as an outpatient before hospitalization, that the patient may be developing viral pneumonia , this is a critical window of therapeutic intervention .  If we have a reasonably effective anti-microbial agent(s) that can be used at this point, we can limit the spread and damage of said pneumonia and likely prevent its transition into Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and the severe complications associated with such including the increased chance of mortality. If we wait until a patient is admitted following the need to meet all of the current admission criteria to a hospital, we may lose the opportunity to stop the complications before they start. Normally all we can do once in the hospital is give supportive care. Even if we begin using the hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine after admission, we may still miss that critical therapeutic window. Fourth, in the citation for the reason for this emergency regulation, it is noted that the medications had not had their safety and efficacy established. I would argue that these medications and related compounds have been in use for many decades (since the 1940âs) in their roles as anti-malarial agents even long before they were used in their current role as rheumatic agents. Therefore, their safety and side effect profiles are well known. â Regarding Efficacy... Regarding efficacy, there is always this argument that there are no controlled randomized placebo trials to refer to. People: âWAKE THE HELL UP!!!!â We are basically fighting a war against this disease, we do NOT have the luxury of time to conduct these trials where one group gets a drug and another a placebo (in fact to do this in this particular setting would be UNETHICAL!!). People are dying out there regardless of the true numbers and we have to rely on the clinical experiences of those who have already combatted this illness and review and use the most effective tools they have used to stop this.  To restrict these agents currently would be akin to asking us as physicians to go into a gun fight with a knife or really nothing at all. Right now, there are NO specifically indicated anti-microbial agents we can use for COVID-19 and even with the highest levels of supportive care in a hospital, we are only hoping on and relying on a patientâs own immune system to do the fighting. Specifically, hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine donât just have a handful of anecdotal reports of effectiveness (sometimes with miraculous results) but have thousands of case reports of positive outcomes from doctors in the hardest hit areas all over the world. This alone should spur us to think, hey there is very likely something to this. I would argue that the sheer number of case reports with positive outcomes alone takes this evidence out of the anecdotal category to one that suggests likely beneficial outcomes. And if so, this should be enough impetus to allow for us as physicians to at least consider making a clinical decision to prescribing the same (in combination with azithromycin) especially on a compassionate (when there is no other option) basis. Another way of saying this would be âthe potential benefits outweigh the risksâ and given the lack of other viable agents, we as conscientious physicians should consider all that we can possibly do to help...
sierraintegrative.com Whois
"domain_name": "SIERRAINTEGRATIVE.COM",
"registrar": "Network Solutions, LLC",
"whois_server": "whois.networksolutions.com",
"referral_url": null,
"updated_date": [
"2020-03-14 00:32:41",
"2019-02-17 12:18:57"
],
"creation_date": "2004-04-16 19:32:45",
"expiration_date": "2024-04-16 19:32:45",
"name_servers": [
"NS41.WORLDNIC.COM",
"NS42.WORLDNIC.COM"
],
"status": "ok https://icann.org/epp#ok",
"emails": [
"abuse@web.com",
"danielle@sbbreno.com",
"devin@globalfinds.com"
],
"dnssec": "unsigned",
"name": "Sierra Integrative Medicine",
"org": "Sierra Integrative Medicine",
"address": "380 BRINKBY AVE",
"city": "RENO",
"state": "NV",
"zipcode": "89509-4349",
"country": "US"